Larible the great: " For a
clown flops are more useful than triumphs ".
David Larible - guest of honor at the "
International Festival of the contemporary circus"
at the Brescia Social Theatre - doesn't want to
hear people repeating that he is the best clown in
the world. And he quotes one of his models, clown
Charlie Rivel, who answered journalists: " It
doesn't matter whether I'm the best or the worse
one. It's important that I know that there will be
someone else after me".
It is hard to find a phrase that synthetizes
better the sense of theatre, ephemeral art by
definition, than consumes itself in the wait of a
moment of beauty, in eternal balance between
tradition and renewal. It's hard to find a more
representative personality nowadays.
Granted the Silver Clown trophy in 1989 and the
Golden Clown two years later at the Montecarlo
Circus Festival, Larible, at 44, represents nearly
all the characteristics of the circus. Take for
instance his family tradition: " We've been in the
circus - he says - for seven generations. My
father was a trapezist and a juggler, the first
Italian to be invited in America at the Ed
Sullivan Show. My mother is a Casartelli, of the
Medrano dynasty".
He presents himself at the mythical American "
Ringling, Barnum and Bayley " circus, where he is
the main attraction, and at the New Circus
festivals like the one in Brescia.
" In the circus art- Larible says - school and
experience melt. I have had the example and the
guidance of my father. I dreammed to be a clown,
and he kept repeating me to practice as an acrobat
and a musician as well, because being a clown is a
point of arrival and departure; you can't make it
if you don't know how "to hold" your audience." He
had a strict apprenticeship: before becoming a
clown Larible has been a juggler, an acrobat, a
trapezist, a dancer.
" Then - he smiles - I was a little fussy. But
that preparation has proved most precious to me
later."
It is easy to speak about success now, but the
beginnings haven't been easy: " In Switzerland, at
my debuts, a critic destroyed me. I felt very bad
about it, but then I understood that this was his
own opinion, and I had to respect it. ". Then came
success and triumph, tributed to me by the
sophisticated and demanding audience of Montecarlo:"
When I won the Golden Clown trophy I had a five
minutes standing ovation. No one before ever had
it. When I think about it, I still have the
shivers.
The balance is more than active, isn't it? " Yes,
but I must admit that failures are more usefull
than triumphs. Failures mould you and they force
you to give ever more ". That practically means
much training. In Brescia I'll have two shows a
day. The prespective of working in a tradition
theater like Brescia's is a great emotion even to
an established clown like myself. " it appeals to
go through this test. The tension before stepping
into the stage keeps you alive. In the theatre you
must face new problems, like the frontal vision of
the stage instead of the circular ring of the
circus ".
But then it isn't so strange: " Clownery is a form
born from the Commedia dell'Arte, even if in the
last century it's been identified mainly with the
circus ".
Now things are changing; the vanguard theatre has
raised the clown to a model: a live actor, free
from routine, who doesn't act, he just is.
" It's the same reason - Larible comments - why
children love us. The clown is an anarchist, he
doesn't follow any rules. He masters the
techniques, sure, but beauty comes from something
else: the tie with the public, the timing, an
almost musical "ear": you can refine, not learn ".
Many young people aspire to become a clown: "
Somed are really good, but often they're mislaid
by the movie business and tv, where they pay more.
The problem is not success, it is to do what you're
prone to." It is a moment of generational
turnover, for all the circus: "That's why I watch
with interest the New Circus. The important thing
is to have professionalism. I love the traditional
for its magic, and the new one for its freshness.
Both have defects: the old circus is kinf of
closed, the new one risks to be looking to much
for the effect . But without experiments you can't
go ahead ".